• Users Online: 288
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
BRIEF REPORT
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 41-45

Plasma Infusion versus plasma exchange as first line therapy in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: A single centre experience


Department of Pediatric Nephrology, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Anil Vasudevan
Department of Pediatric Nephrology, St. Johns's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/AJPN.AJPN_38_18

Rights and Permissions

Plasma exchange (PEX) remains the standard therapy for the management of atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome (aHUS) in regions where eculizumab is not available. Where even PEX is not feasible or afforded, patients are managed with plasma infusion (PI). This single-center, retrospective study compares the efficacy of PI with PEX and examined for predictors of renal recovery in pediatric patients with aHUS admitted at a single center in a developing country from January 2005 to June 2017. Endpoints for comparison were time to hematological remission, duration of hospitalization, rates of complete and partial renal recovery, time to progression to chronic kidney disease Stage 5, and occurrence of relapses. Of 53 children presenting at 6.3 ± 3.9 years of age, 24 and 22 patients were managed with PI and PEX, respectively. The latter group of patients was sicker at presentation and included 13 children with antibodies to complement factor H. All patients achieved hematological remission, including four patients refractory to PI who were switched to PEX. Patients managed on PI were discharged from hospital earlier than those on PEX and were more often with complete renal recovery (55% vs. 27%). At 1.5 (0.5–72) months of follow-up, similar proportions of 31 patients managed with PI and PEX showed complete and partial renal recovery and had comparable rates of relapse and disease progression. Presentation with acute kidney injury Stage 3 and edema were independent predictors of incomplete renal recovery at discharge. Both PEX and PI are associated with satisfactory short-term outcomes in patients with aHUS lacking access to eculizumab, and PEX might be preferred over PI in patients with severe disease and those with anticomplement factor H antibodies.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed576    
    Printed79    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded84    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal